On 01/28/2011 03:14 PM, walter harms wrote:
Am 28.01.2011 13:59, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Fre, 2011-01-28 at 13:10 +0200, Rami Ylimäki wrote:
XGetImage request will correctly fail and terminate x11perf with a
BadMatch error if window is larger than its backing pixmap.
This change makes all tests from putimage10 to getimagexy500 work on
screens that are smaller than the default window size.
The numbers are not comparable if the operation dimensions are
different. It might be better to refuse tests that can't fit.
but the idea i correct. May be an extra test ?
On the other side: what is the time difference ?
re,
wh
For example, compwinwin500 was 80% faster with reduced window size.
How about refusing the tests by default to make them comparable, but
introducing -width, -height, and -redirect options for those who still
want to run all tests? The extra options would print to the output to
make it clear that nonstandard options are used.
-- Rami
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
