Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]> (29/01/2011):
> I recall some readings putting emphasis on the fact that the library
> did not depend on libX11.
> […]
> Maybe this include is not necessary or there is an alternate
> solution to not depend on X11.

Ooh, thanks.

This include indeed seems extraneous, removing it seems to do the job
just fine. New patch to come in a few seconds.

(Added Kristian to Cc, just to make sure.)

KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to