Re: [PATCH v2 12/25] [libx11] Instead of copying the value returned by get_prop_name and then releasing it, directly use the return value of get_prop_name, which allocates memory for the name.

Alan Coopersmith Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:47:52 -0800

On 01/31/11 11:42 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Plus this would solve the "unused variable prop_name" warning that your patch
> would introduce.


Never mind that bit, your patch still used prop_name, just as an extra variable
to copy through.

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-        [email protected]
         Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 12/25] [libx11] Instead of copying the value returned by get_prop_name and then releasing it, directly use the return value of get_prop_name, which allocates memory for the name.

Reply via email to