Hi, On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:46:14PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:16:46 -0800, Aaron Plattner <aplatt...@nvidia.com> > wrote: > > However, I do need to object strongly to such a major protocol change being > > made after RC2 of a release cycle. We're supposed to be making only > > critical bug fixes at this point! Planning fail. > > So, I think I can resolve these issues, and I thank you for your > review. I clearly need to be more careful about getting protocol changes > and client API reviews made before committing code into the X server. > > As an alternative plan, I've got a server branch with all of RandR 1.4 > removed so that we can properly review the protocol, client library > interfaces and driver interfaces. > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver.git backout-randr > > I'd love to hear opinions on which option people would be happiest with.
I'd be happiest with RandR 1.4 backed out until 1.11. I just don't think it's had quite enough (non-rushed) review, exposure or testing, and it's not the best of precedents to be setting for future releases. Sorry. Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
