> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:27:47 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis <[email protected]>
> 
> > From: Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue,  8 Mar 2011 14:56:33 -0500
> > 
> > DMTModes is what xf86DefaultModes was always meant to be.
> 
> I'd say xf86DefaultModes is a better variable name than DMTModes for
> an exported symbol though.

Hmm, looking at this a bit more, is it really ok to include the
"reduced blanking" modes in xf86DefaultModes?
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to