On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:07 +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 14/03/2011 18:23, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 08:18 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > >> I think to be correct you need -I$(top_srcdir) and -I$(top_builddir) > >> so you get both sessreg.h and config.h (included through sessreg.h). > >> The alternative is to leave filenames.sed.c in the top directory and > >> ensure it gets built before descending to the man directory. > > > > > > Sounds good, there should be no -I.. ragardless. > > > > I have posted a set of remaining patches to replace the cpp stuff with > > plain robust man pages. > > I had found many issues with the current man pages in terms of content. > > These patches also fix the current build problem. > > Attached is an updated patch using both -I$(top_srcdir) and -I$(top_builddir), > I'm not sure why I thought just -I$(top_srcdir) was sufficent. > > If you aren't going forward with your other suggested patches to sessreg, can > I get a r-b: for this?
Sure. Reviewed-by: Gaetan Nadon <mems...@videotron.ca> > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
