On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:28 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > > Dan, which justifications do you feel are incorrect? Agreed that > accurate commit msgs are important so we'll try to clear them up. > > > I think the issue has been resolved with the new series I have posted and > Dan > has acknowledged the patches. > > I just have to write a more intelligent commit message as I just dumped > the README in there, which was lazyness. > > The of it is that by using -x has Dan suggested, we can use a real > customization > layer like the rest of the world does rather than a hacked-up xmlto > fragment. > Our customization layer will always be local on disk and import the docbook > xsl > using the xml catalog. > > Should we ever need to drop xmlto in favor of xsltproc for one or more > formats, > we do not need to change our customization xsl.
Yeah, the issue was that Gaetan's commit message said that xstlproc was being used because xmlto only accepted xsl fragments, but said in a follow up that it was because the masterdb required using bare xsltproc. You also said that it was because xmlto prevented the DTD from being fetched from the network. I just want to make sure that the actual reason gets in the commit message. -- Dan _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
