On 04/05/2011 03:41 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:07:33PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
Well, it's an RFC by Peter at the moment, AFAIK not much to read. I'll
add a bit to my idea FYC. The concept would probably use pixman and
list.h-lists and look something like:
So, at the risk of sounding like a bit of an arse here ... what's the
planned usecase?
I ask mainly because we already have a very extensively-engineered
pointer acceleration architecture, where 90% of the code could probably
be removed without more than seven people noticing. I'm kind of wary of
adding another possibly-overengineered transformation architecture where
the only current feasibly-demonstrated usecase (TTBOMK) is rotation.
Of course, if we could demonstrate a real need for this, then great.
But I'm kind of nervous about making the input path more complex still,
just because we can.
agreed.
and bonus points if we could disable/enable the acceleration
architecture in compilation time also.
Tiago
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
