(related to my recent reply for the 1.10 merge of this patch) I believe this should this instead be: + else if (dev && dev->valuator->axes[xv->first_valuator + j].mode == Absolute)
On Mar 31, 2011, at 08:29, Chase Douglas wrote: > Relative valuator values should not be reported in any future events. If > a relative valuator value is not set in an internal event, set the value > to 0 for XI 1.x valuator events sent over the wire. > > Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <[email protected]> > --- > dix/eventconvert.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dix/eventconvert.c b/dix/eventconvert.c > index 3285133..088ba98 100644 > --- a/dix/eventconvert.c > +++ b/dix/eventconvert.c > @@ -389,8 +389,10 @@ getValuatorEvents(DeviceEvent *ev, deviceValuator *xv) > for (j = 0; j < xv->num_valuators; j++) { > if (BitIsOn(ev->valuators.mask, xv->first_valuator + j)) > valuators[j] = ev->valuators.data[xv->first_valuator + j]; > - else > + else if (dev->valuator->axes[xv->first_valuator + j].mode == > Absolute) > valuators[j] = dev->valuator->axisVal[xv->first_valuator + j]; > + else > + valuators[j] = 0; > } > > if (i + 6 < num_valuators) > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
