On Apr 5, 2011, at 18:02, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 4/5/11 4:17 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: >> On 04/05/2011 11:15 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: >>> There is still a ton of fat left in there... but most of the fat is >>> rather benign (whitespace, deleting dead code, etc), so I don't have >>> a problem with it if it's part of the whole package. > > I tried a first cut series that narrowed down to just the really key bits > (redoing _glapi_add_dispatch and the context tag rewrite), but there was > enough change in context from other patches in the series that this was both > mechanically easier and more obviously corresponds to master.
yeah. Like I said though... the fat isn't the problem since it is "obviously right". I don't mind fat as long as the meat is good! ... >>> How would you feel about sitting on this until after 1.10.1 is out? >>> If there is a pressing reason why this should be part of 1.10.1 (such >>> as fixing clutter failures that were not in 1.9.5), then I'll >>> certainly consider merging it for RC2 and pushing out 1.10.1 by a >>> allow more time for testing feedback. > > I can wait until 1.10.2. There's at least one more GLX fix that logically > belongs with this set, which I haven't sent a pull for master for yet so I > didn't feel right including it in the stable branch. Ok, then I'd like to merge them all (including the not-yet-on-master set) in at once after releasing 1.10.1 Thanks, Jeremy _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
