Hi, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:34:52PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote: > Heh, I thought of that but decided not to do it as it would be so > different from the rest of the entries. In any case, attached is the > patch using that style.
Though I prefer the original one by virtue of fitting in better, take my R-b for either form: Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
