Anyone want to comment or review before I push and cut a macros 1.14.0 release?
-alan- On 05/16/11 05:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Since we're intentionally doing a special case to just check cpp output, > and not a full program compilation, add the magic macro to silence: > > configure.ac:46: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected > in body > ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:1077: XORG_PROG_RAWCPP is expanded from... > configure.ac:46: the top level > > Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> > --- > xorg-macros.m4.in | 6 ++++-- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xorg-macros.m4.in b/xorg-macros.m4.in > index f89efb6..a21cf7e 100644 > --- a/xorg-macros.m4.in > +++ b/xorg-macros.m4.in > @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ AC_PATH_PROGS(RAWCPP, [cpp], [${CPP}], > # which is not the best choice for supporting other OS'es, but covers most > # of the ones we need for now. > AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $RAWCPP requires -undef]) > -AC_LANG_CONFTEST([Does cpp redefine unix ?]) > +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([Does cpp redefine unix ? > + AC_LANG_DEFINES_PROVIDED]) > if test `${RAWCPP} < conftest.$ac_ext | grep -c 'unix'` -eq 1 ; then > AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) > else > @@ -82,7 +83,8 @@ fi > rm -f conftest.$ac_ext > > AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $RAWCPP requires -traditional]) > -AC_LANG_CONFTEST([Does cpp preserve "whitespace"?]) > +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([Does cpp preserve "whitespace"? > + AC_LANG_DEFINES_PROVIDED]) > if test `${RAWCPP} < conftest.$ac_ext | grep -c 'preserve \"'` -eq 1 ; then > AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) > else -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel