On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:26:56 +0200 (CEST) Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Micha=C5=82=20G=C3=B3rny?= <[email protected]> > > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:59:43 +0200 > > > > Signed-off-by: MichaĹ GĂłrny <[email protected]> > > Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38339 > > > Makefile.am | 10 ++++++++++ > > configure.ac | 12 ++++++++++++ > > [email protected] | 10 ++++++++++ > > Is it really a good idea to have a file with an '@' character in its > name? It's not in the Portable Filename Character Set defined by > POSIX. Well, the other solution is to rename the file on generation/install. In any case, systemd requires that character in order to support naming the service '[email protected]' after install. Considering the particular use cases, we don't need to worry about portability of that particular character. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
