Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> (16/06/2011): > do all of them require the new xproto? afaict, only the ones "mark > variable unused" do, the others should be good to merge as-is. If you > could separate those out, I'd be happy to pull them and leave the > others until xproto has been released.
correct, although I think time would be better be spent on getting xproto ready (which should be my next move). > also - you mention xorg-sgml-doctools fun but I don't see the association > here (cursory glance only), aren't these all compiler hints? see http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-June/023153.html and some mails before that for an explanation of the dependency between releasing xproto and xorg-sgml-doctools :) Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
