Hi, On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:41:54PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > > - *dx = -xb1 * (HIST(0).millis - hw->millis); > > - *dy = -yb1 * (HIST(0).millis - hw->millis); > > + *dx = -xb1 * (start_time - hw->millis); > > + *dy = -yb1 * (start_time - hw->millis); > > Why not like this... it is slightly easier on the brain, at least for me: > > + *dx = xb1 * (hw->millis - start_time); > + *dy = yb1 * (hw->millis - start_time);
There's now a comment explaining this. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
