Hi, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:51:38AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:53:34AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hmm, it's hard to say. Certainly on the face of it it seems cleaner to > > leave it as driver-native data, but I'm kind of worried that clients may > > have come to rely on the principle that any DeviceEvent will show up > > with a corresponding RawEvent.
Now I think about this, I'm almost certain it won't be a problem, given that RawButtonRelease events didn't exist until XI 2.1 either. :) > > If we're going down this route, it might be best to cut raw events from > > things like XTEST/WarpPointer as well? > > WarpPointer certainly. XTEST not sure, because in the end the XTest device > is a device, so the data could be regarded as raw data. > > Plus, xtest is currently the only sensible way to emulate devices from an X > client, being able to use raw events here seems beneficial (and it doesn't > require extra code anyway). OK, seems fair. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
