On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 05:38 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > Sorry, but why is that silly? It just says that you need version 1.0 > to build but it's disabled by default. That doesn't seem unusual to > me. > >
Correct, I realized that just after send the email. My first thought was "why would I care about the version if I said no anyway?" Then I thought one could configure using --with-fop and 1.0 would be requested. Sorry for the noise. I posted a status quo patch which will allow me to complete the work. Then I can submit a [1.0] patch and aggregate feedback. Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
