Thanks. It's in the pull request I just sent. The generator script is in mesa, so I'll try to figure this out in mesa as well.
--Jeremy On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 27/06/2011 18:38, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: >> Those bits in the NoOp stub can be left out on Win32 (or you can tell me the >> Win32 way of figuring that out). It's just used to provide extra info to >> give a hint as to which call was unimplemented. > > Looking at this a bit more I notice that we already have the autoconf > machinery to check if backtrace() is available, so let's use that, rather > than trying to come up with a list of targets which have those functions. > > There's no easy way to implement equivalent functionality to backtrace() on > Win32, which is why cygwin doesn't have a backtrace() function yet :-) > > Patch attached, although obviously it's the code generator for this file > which should be fixed... > > > <0001-Guard-use-of-backtrace-with-HAVE_BACKTRACE.patch> _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
