On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:53:14 -0400, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> This was necessary in DRI1 for a variety of reasons (SAREA ownership, > VRAM layout, etc). None of that is relevant to DRI2. Tested with Gnome > 3 on an Ironlake GPU. Yeah, I can't see how you can use DRI2 (which has no locking for GPU access) without a competent kernel driver that can handle rendering requests while a non-X VT is active. -- [email protected]
pgpfWcmr21E8T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
