On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:47 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 06:04:28AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 4005df66072ceac175ea71427deb16176262f197.
> > >
> > > The patch introduces a couple of issues.
> > > 1) These tools are apps and conceptually do not depend on Xserver,
> > > so XORG_CFLAGS should not be used. It included pixman header files.
> > > Only drivers depend xserver
> > 
> > This is not true here. synclient includes <xserver-properties.h> so it
> > can use the input properties designated by the server. 
> 
> 
> As I understand, this is handled by the -I$(sdkdir) in the patch (instead of
> $XORG_CFLAGS). Having said this, the dependency on the header can easily be
> removed.

That's the reason for -I$(sdkdir) rather than XORG_CFLAGS. In previous
patches reviewers
have commented that XORG_CFLAGS should not be used for tools.

Having seen Peter's patch, it's great to remove the dependency on
xserver_properties.
It will be much clearer now.

> 
> Cheers,
>   Peter
> 
> > I don't see a
> > reason to revert this patch. It seems to have good fixes in it.
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to