On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:04:08AM +0200, Michael Thayer wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:18:48PM +0200, Michael Thayer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:40 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:52:16AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Lennart Poettering > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Don't enumerate/monitor all devices of the system (since that can be > > > > > > quite a few), but limit our search to devices from the "input" > > > > > > subsystem, as well as the "tty" subsystem (to cover Wacom tablets). > > > > > > > > > > > > This should make X start up a bit faster and reduce the number of > > > > > > unnecessary wake-ups of the X server. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > config/udev.c | 7 +++++++ > > > > > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/config/udev.c b/config/udev.c > > > > > > index 5ac52a1..0763cc9 100644 > > > > > > --- a/config/udev.c > > > > > > +++ b/config/udev.c > > > > > > @@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ config_udev_init(void) > > > > > > if (!udev_monitor) > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > + udev_monitor_filter_add_match_subsystem_devtype(udev_monitor, > > > > > > "input", NULL); > > > > > > + udev_monitor_filter_add_match_subsystem_devtype(udev_monitor, > > > > > > "tty", NULL); /* For Wacom serial devices */ > > > > > > + > > > > > > if (udev_monitor_enable_receiving(udev_monitor)) { > > > > > > ErrorF("config/udev: failed to bind the udev monitor\n"); > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > @@ -289,6 +292,10 @@ config_udev_init(void) > > > > > > enumerate = udev_enumerate_new(udev); > > > > > > if (!enumerate) > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem(enumerate, "input"); > > > > > > + udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem(enumerate, "tty"); > > > > > > + > > > > > > udev_enumerate_scan_devices(enumerate); > > > > > > devices = udev_enumerate_get_list_entry(enumerate); > > > > > > udev_list_entry_foreach(device, devices) { > > > > > > > > > > Last time this came up, we were a little uneasy about limiting the > > > > > subsystems. I guess this should work for devices we care about, and > > > > > any future input devices should fall under the input subsystem (I > > > > > hope). One thing we could use help on in upstream udev is marking the > > > > > appropriate serial devices with ID_INPUT* in > > > > > 60-persistent-input.rules. I'm cc'ing Thomas since he was the one who > > > > > originally requested that we not just filter to input. > > > > > > > > At this point, all input devices that I've seen* are either supported > > > > by the > > > > kernel or are legacy serial devices that don't have a kernel driver > > > > (yet). > > > > I think we'll be fine filtering for those two only. > > > Sorry for the late response - I was rather behind on reading this list. > > > I would greatly appreciate it if you could add the "misc" subsystem for > > > the sake of the VirtualBox mouse integration. > > > > Not that I know anything about the details, but can we make the VirtualBox > > mouse integration appear in the input subsystem? that seems to be the better > > fix here. > Not (as far as I can see) without writing a proper kernel input driver - > which is something I do intend to do as soon as possible, but I hadn't > actually planned to do it immediately. Of course if you say that > enumerating "misc" is not acceptable to you then I will probably have to > give it a priority boost.
imo it seems to be the better solution than just whitelisting "misc", which at least partially defeats the purpose of restricting to input subsystems only. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
