On 23 September 2011 18:37, Alex Deucher <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Michal Suchanek <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 22 September 2011 19:34, Alan Coopersmith >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 09/22/11 08:32, Michal Suchanek wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Can anybody, please, explain how this bug[1] could have remained in >>>> Xorg for two years assuming any sanity is remaining among Xorg >>>> developers? >>> >>> If we were sane, we wouldn't still be working on X, especially not >>> after people pile on abuse for things like that. >>> >> >> There are obviously people sabotaging X already since the change went >> in more than two years ago and stayed in spite of being pointed out as >> bogus. >> >> I can understand that it is not possible to fix all issues at once or >> that implementing new features may bring new bugs but actively >> breaking a previously working feature is a different thing altogether. >> >> If "we won't talk about this" is the only answer then that's also an >> answer I guess. > > Feel free to deal with all the "my fonts are too big" bugs that come > up when the xserver uses the real dpi. A lot of people expect a > hardcoded 96 dpi whether it makes sense or not. >
And a lot of people expect readable text even on small notebooks. So you get lots of bugs one way or another. Thanks Michal _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
