On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 01:13:26PM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote: > Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner <[email protected]>
Thanks! > On 09/28/2011 12:58 PM, Jamey Sharp wrote: > >Yeah, I don't think that belongs in this commit. Actually, I want to > >delete Xnest entirely, along with all the other non-xfree86 DDXes. :-) > > Yeah, if xf86-video-nested actually works, I'm on board with that. > (I haven't tested it). We had it running on Jeremy's laptop in OS X at XDC, which was pretty exciting. Resurrecting the IOADDRESS/bus cleanup work is part of the fallout from that exercise. Still not quite ready to declare the existing DDXes dead, but we're getting closer. :-) > Aargh, you're right. I blame MS Exchange -- it converts incoming > utf-8 messages to base64 and breaks them in the process, so I wonder > if it did something similar to your patch. Did you send it with > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable, or is that Exchange's > dirty work too? It didn't have any MIME headers when it left me, as far as I can tell. So yeah, I blame Exchange too... :-) Jamey
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
