On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 01:57:27PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > >> I'm not sure we need to be even this verbose; just a single warning when > >> the queue is blocked and another one when it starts working again should > >> be sufficient. I fear flooding the disk with errors if this happens > >> because your cat falls asleep on the keyboard while watching dancing > >> mice on the screen. > > > > That's why we shut up after DROP_BACKTRACE_MAX reports. What about > > lowering DROP_BACKTRACE_MAX to 5 rather than 20? > > Also, if your cat falls asleep on the keyboard, the system either can keep > up with the generated events (no logging before or after this patch) or it > fills up the queue and we have dropped events.
I thought X kills kittens anyway. This is a nonissue. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
