On Mit, 2011-10-19 at 11:20 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > > As I understand it, you want to allow accelerated 2D rendering at the > *DIX* level (whereas EXA and XAA are for Xorg DDX drivers).
Actually, EXA is at the DIX level as well, and used by Xephyr. > That is a great goal, but another current goal of many of us in Xorg > is to eliminate the non-Xorg DDXs and replace things like XQuartz, > Xnest, and Xvfb with drivers in the Xorg "DDX" ... after that is done, > hw/xfree86 will actually be device-independent and we can start > refactoring the current DIX/DDX boundary. Jamey's idea might be a nice way to address that. Either way, if glamor can stop the ridiculous proliferation of X acceleration layers, I'm all for it... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
