Hi! On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:32:01 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:49:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 15:49:33 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > > On 10/ 6/11 03:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > > >This allows for other consumers to do single-step decoding/emulation > > > >when using x86emu. Additionally adds a stand-alone Makefile for building > > > >out of tree, which is very handy for doing emulation debugging. > > > > > > What ever happened to the plan to move it out to a separate library that > > > Xorg just depends on? We have another user here who is currently just > > > copying the code from Xorg and would prefer to share a library with us. > > > > I thought libx86 [0] was supposed to be just that. > > [0] <http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/libx86/> > > So, until Xorg is linked against libx86, can my patch be applied to the > Xorg emulator? From what I can see it is where fixes keep landing.
Hmm true. So it probably makes sense to apply it in both, so that they don't get more out-of-sync. Matthew the patch being talked about here can be found at: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-October/026108.html> What's your opinion? Also, maybe it also would make sense to request that people get patches for x86emu first in libx86, before merging them in the X server? regards, guillem _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
