On 11-12-20 09:13 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 12/19/11 18:50, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Provide end users with a workaround if they find code doesn't build with
the -Werror=... flags provided by BASE_CFLAGS. This can be useful if
newer util-macros are used with older source code that had problems, or
in the rare case when warnings are expanded to hit more cases (although
this case should not happen too much in practice).
Should --enable-selective-werror be forcibly enabled for distchecking via
DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS ?
This option is enabled by default, so it is applied at distcheck time,
even if the module was configured with --disable-selective-werror at the
time when 'make distcheck' was invoked.
Now that you mention it, if those who need --disable-selective-werror
because they are "stuck" otherwise will not be able to run distcheck.
That makes me wonder if this option will be on any use for those who
cannot build without it in the first place. This was the motivation to
create this option to begin with. Hmmm...
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
