Hi, On 11 January 2012 22:54, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > I can easily do that. Now, the only question is one of names. I'm not > sure I like changing where the release is done; keeping it on master > makes things straightforward (at least for me, and perhaps for > others?). The pending changes could be in a 'next' branch. Each time I > merged patches to master I could either: > > a) merge master->next > > b) rebase next on top of master > > a) will result in a ton of merge commits on next, but would keep the > temporal ordering of patches 'correct'. b) will make 'next' look a lot > cleaner, but lose ordering information.
I don't mind which, but if there's a single blessed tree I can submit my extmod/unexport changes to -- and get them merged so I don't have to constantly rebase -- I'd be pretty happy about that. And some other invasive changes, too. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
