On 01/14/2012 02:52 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 16:12:25 -0800, Chad Versace wrote:
>
>> When attempting to open the console device during initialization, X first
>> tries to open /dev/tty0 in write-only mode, and if that fails it attempts
>> to open /dev/vc/0. If both attempts fail, the error message below is
>> logged. The message is incorrect because the errno is that resulting from
>> the failure to open /dev/vc/0.
>>
>> xf86OpenConsole: Cannot open /dev/tty0 ({strerror(errno)})
>>
>> On a machine in which /dev/tty0 does exist but /dev/vc/0 does not, such as
>> my machine, the log misleadingly says:
>>
>> Fatal server error:
>> [ 3167.976] xf86OpenConsole: Cannot open /dev/tty0 (No such file or
>> directory)
>>
>> This patch fixes the log to report the correct errno for each device. The
>> result is this log snippet:
>>
>> [ 3755.177] (WW) xf86OpenConsole: Failed to open /dev/tty0 for writing
>> (Permission denied)
>> [ 3755.177] (WW) xf86OpenConsole: Failed to open /dev/vc/0 for writing
>> (No such file or directory)
>> [ 3755.177]
>> Fatal server error:
>> [ 3755.177] xf86OpenConsole: Failed to open console device
>>
> Maybe we should just drop the /dev/vc/0 stuff? Surely nobody uses devfs
> anymore?
If that's the consensus, sure, I don't care about /dev/vc. But I'm new to the
Xserver (this is my first patch) and don't feel comfortable yet gutting out
anything. This change is small, unobtrusive, and clearly breaks nothing.
----
Chad Versace
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
