Hi Walter, Thanks for your review.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:15 AM, walter harms <[email protected]> wrote: > would you mind to drop a line or two why this is needed ? I don't think anybody implied or said that this is a *needed* change, so I wouldn't want to defend a position that was never taken nor implied. Instead of started a potentially long, meandering thread about whether or not a rename would be nice, I started instead with the patch, but I never meant to imply I thought this was something that was needed. - "build.sh" is rather generic - most people are dropping (or never liked) the ".sh" at the end of scripts - most executables from this project start with either "x" or "xorg" This project appears to be in a bit of a "cleanup" mode (e.g. let's consider and apply a coding style) so I thought it would be a good time to consider a rename of this script. If you're not in favour of this change would it be because of the timing, or would you never be in favour of this change? Best regards, Trevor _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
