On 01/25/2012 11:42 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > On 12-01-25 05:30 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: >> On 01/25/2012 11:03 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote: >>> See the attached html file in the reply to this e-mail. >>> >>> Gaetan Nadon (5): >>> specs: Edit titles for section 3 and 4 >>> specs: remove older manually typed in section number >>> specs: fix Appendix A title >>> specs: use subsections to group use cases description >>> specs: replace hard coded number in some "See section" references >> I'm ok with each of these changes. Not having any numbers for sections >> makes references when reading the plain text a bit more cumbersome, but >> anyone who is interested can probably figure it out. We should all move >> to the digital age of HTML by now anyways :). > I noticed Asciidoc has a text format as an output format. I can give it > a try. > Perhaps it has the toc and section numbers.
The hope is that we the asciidoc source is good enough as a document. It makes it easier to follow if that's all you have. I still think it's good enough without section numbers. -- Chase _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
