Can we delay the libX11 change until this is in a tagged libxcb (and have libX11 require that version to avoid regression)? All the changes currently on xcb/libxcb master look 1.8.1 worthy, so perhaps we can push this one into the mix and get a 1.8.1 this week.
--Jeremy On Feb 19, 2012, at 04:43, Julien Cristau wrote: > Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau <[email protected]> > --- > src/xcb_util.c | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/xcb_util.c b/src/xcb_util.c > index fde4f85..6d9efe0 100644 > --- a/src/xcb_util.c > +++ b/src/xcb_util.c > @@ -234,6 +234,11 @@ static int _xcb_open(const char *host, char *protocol, > const int display) > fd = _xcb_open_unix(protocol, file); > free(file); > > + if (fd < 0 && !protocol && *host == '\0') { > + unsigned short port = X_TCP_PORT + display; > + fd = _xcb_open_tcp(host, protocol, port); > + } > + > return fd; > #endif /* !_WIN32 */ > return -1; /* if control reaches here then something has gone wrong */ > -- > 1.7.9 > _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
