On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 02:47:36PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > <#part sign=pgpmime> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:56:52 -0800, Alan Coopersmith > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are you going to pull in Daniel's code style change now? Of all the -next > > candidates from the last few months, that was the biggest I remember. > > Yes, that needs to happen now or not at all. It will make back-porting > fixes painful for a while, but the alternative is to forever live with > the existing mish-mash of coding styles. > > Daniel: do you want to re-spin the patch for 1.12 now? iirc, it was just > a purely mechanical operation, right? > > The testing I did last time was to compare the emitted instruction > sequences for every file compiled for my environment.
please bump the version number in configure.ac as well. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
