On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:41:25PM -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> The #ifndef in log.c looks wrong, but otherwise, sure, why not? With that 
> fixed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <[email protected]>

oops, amended, thanks.

Cheers,
  Peter
 
> On 3/13/12, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Just a nice-to-have, makes grep a tad easier.
> >
> >  include/os.h |    1 +
> >  os/log.c     |    5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/os.h b/include/os.h
> > index 48ce329..1e90cc5 100644
> > --- a/include/os.h
> > +++ b/include/os.h
> > @@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ typedef enum {
> >      X_INFO,                        /* Informational message */
> >      X_NONE,                        /* No prefix */
> >      X_NOT_IMPLEMENTED,             /* Not implemented */
> > +    X_DEBUG,                       /* Debug message */
> >      X_UNKNOWN = -1         /* unknown -- this must always be last */
> >  } MessageType;
> >
> > diff --git a/os/log.c b/os/log.c
> > index 671a01b..5a2e5a8 100644
> > --- a/os/log.c
> > +++ b/os/log.c
> > @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ asm (".desc ___crashreporter_info__, 0x10");
> >  #ifndef X_NOT_IMPLEMENTED_STRING
> >  #define X_NOT_IMPLEMENTED_STRING   "(NI)"
> >  #endif
> > +#ifndef X_DEBUG
> > +#define X_DEBUG_STRING                  "(DB)"
> > +#endif
> >  #ifndef X_NONE_STRING
> >  #define X_NONE_STRING                   ""
> >  #endif
> > @@ -361,6 +364,8 @@ LogMessageTypeVerbString(MessageType type, int verb)
> >     return X_UNKNOWN_STRING;
> >      case X_NONE:
> >     return X_NONE_STRING;
> > +    case X_DEBUG:
> > +   return X_DEBUG_STRING;
> >      default:
> >     return X_UNKNOWN_STRING;
> >      }
> > --
> > 1.7.7.6
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > [email protected]: X.Org development
> > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
> >
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to