On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Chase Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yeah... we can certainly have a server-1.11.4-branch (or some other name) >> which allows you to maintain a centralized branch pre-reformatting. It will >> have less cherry-picks than the main server-1.11-branch (or at least lag >> behind it a bit), but it may be helpful to distros in your situation. > > I think that's a bit overkill. If we are going to reformat the 1.11 and > earlier branches, then we might as well leave it at that and let the > downstreams worry about it. Or, actually have someone maintain a > pre-formatted branch. However, adding another level of stable branches > (and releases?) that differ from the main stable branches could get very > confusing. I wasn't suggesting actual releases from that branch. At this point there aren't even any plans for future releases from the stable-1.11-branch (although there may be an out-of-band one in the future like I did with 1.10). I'm just trying to figure out a way to best collect these "pre-formatted" changes for everyone to benefit from. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
