On 15 May 2012 12:38, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:18:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 15 May 2012 06:20, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:39:24AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>>
>> >> diff --git a/dix/enterleave.h b/dix/enterleave.h
>> >> index 729059b..c937c0e 100644
>> >> --- a/dix/enterleave.h
>> >> +++ b/dix/enterleave.h
>> >> @@ -60,9 +60,6 @@ extern void LeaveWindow(DeviceIntPtr dev);
>> >>  extern void CoreFocusEvent(DeviceIntPtr kbd,
>> >>                             int type, int mode, int detail, WindowPtr 
>> >> pWin);
>> >>
>> >> -extern void DeviceFocusEvent(DeviceIntPtr kbd,
>> >> -                             int type, int mode, int detail, WindowPtr 
>> >> pWin);
>> >> -
>> >>  extern void SetFocusIn(DeviceIntPtr kbd, WindowPtr win);
>> >>
>> >>  extern void SetFocusOut(DeviceIntPtr dev);
>> >
>> > This hunk gives me
>> >
>> > enterleave.c: In function 'DeviceFocusOutEvents':
>> > enterleave.c:618:9: error: implicit declaration of function
>> > 'DeviceFocusEvent' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> > enterleave.c:618:9: warning: nested extern declaration of 
>> > 'DeviceFocusEvent'
>> > [-Wnested-externs]
>> >
>>
>> I did some compile tests but maybe this one slipped by.
>>
>> Just add this additional hunk.
>
> I think it'd be better to remove the DeviceFocusEvent() function from
> exevents.h and leave it in enterleave.h instead, including that header where
> needed. This way the focus/enter-leave functions are just in one header.

You could argue that way for all exevents.h and exglobals.h declarations.

Should these headers be removed?

On the other hand, that enterleave.c is a separate file that has its
own header is internal to the Xserver implementations and can change
in the future so you could argue that enterleave.h should be
abolished, too.

Thanks

Michal
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to