Adam Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > On 5/15/12 3:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> My concern is how you're going to build this programmatically if you > keep with a poke-one-thing model, I just envision intermediate states > that don't make a ton of sense on their own but that we'd end up needing > to allow. What do you imagine the sequence of requests looking like? Should we try to get the everything-at-once stuff from randr 1.4 rebased and reviewed again? One thing that stymied it the first time was that extending randr for more stuff like this looked 'hard'. -- [email protected]
pgpbgWPFXHoBK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
