On 05/22/12 11:37 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Die, 2012-05-22 at 08:34 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> On 05/22/12 02:07 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >>>> No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> >>> >>> Duplicate of http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-May/030843.html >> >> Oh, cool, it's not just me. >> >> Has a pull request been sent for that or was it submitted as a single patch >> waiting for Keith to apply directly? > > I haven't seen a pull request, so I assume the latter.
Looking at the headers captured in http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/10174/ it does seem to be addressed to Keith to apply: From: Michal Srb <[email protected]> To: Keith Packard <[email protected]> Subject: [PATCH] dri2: SProcDRI2Connect - send the response. Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 18:29:56 +0200 Message-ID: <2391089.ABGY0Qo0ou@dhcp71> Cc: [email protected] Keith - are you behind on individual patches vs. pulls or is there something else wrong with this one? -- -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
