Jeremy Huddleston <[email protected]> writes:
> Can you please put the XQuartz mutex lock inside of the > inProcessInputEvents grab/release. I know the number of instructions > is small, but there's no reason to hold the lock when checking or > setting inProcessInputEvents. It's a mutex on miEventQueue. Uh. That would require that the test/set of the inProcessInputEvents be atomic; placing that test inside the mutex ensures that the check works correctly. I know it would 'probably' work just fine, but it's not nice to see obviously incorrect code like that lying around. -- [email protected]
pgp2fNoXBwBsf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
