Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> writes: > An alternative change would be to add this to os/osinit.c but iirc the > xfree86 ddx is the only one that actually needs SIGIO, right?
Oh. Ick. OsBlockSignals and xf86BlockSIGIO both mess with sigprocmask. Surely that can't be a good thing. (Note that kdrive *also* has sigprocmask calls (not that we really care about kdrive anymore).) Seems like we should create an OsBlockSIGIO function and have it cooperate with OsBlockSignals, then call that from both xf86 and kdrive. -- [email protected]
pgpSn9NtFi7R4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
