Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> writes: > no, but the selinux fix will need it (partially out of laziness, partially > to make the code nicer).
Ok. I'll merged it in then. >> (the more I see of these twisty list macros, the more I prefer >> open-coded lists though; wow this is hard to understand). > > given how often we've found bugs in open-coded lists I disagree. > yes, they're hairy but they're tested, the macro behaves the same > everywhere. and if you really worry about the code being wrong, run it > through the pre-processor and it will look like an open-coded list. It's all a tradeoff -- I just don't like having to learn a new programming language each time I see a new set of list macros (or other macro programming of this nature). Reminds me of how loathsome C++ templates are. -- [email protected]
pgpMw7u14z701.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
