We never use child[3], so it's state is undefined. This issue seems to have existed since the test was first written: 92788e677be79bd04e5ef140f4ced50ad8b1bf8e
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <[email protected]> CC: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> --- test/list.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/list.c b/test/list.c index 82d2327..f9f54ee 100644 --- a/test/list.c +++ b/test/list.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void test_xorg_list_del(void) { struct parent parent = { 0 }; - struct child child[3]; + struct child child[2]; struct child *c; xorg_list_init(&parent.children); @@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ test_xorg_list_del(void) xorg_list_add(&child[0].node, &parent.children); xorg_list_del(&parent.children); assert(xorg_list_is_empty(&parent.children)); + assert(!xorg_list_is_empty(&child[0].node)); assert(!xorg_list_is_empty(&child[1].node)); - assert(!xorg_list_is_empty(&child[2].node)); } static void -- 1.7.11.5 _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
