On 09/10/2012 06:08 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 10 September 2012 23:33, Maarten Maathuis<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Clemens Eisserer<[email protected]> wrote:
I just realized that at least on my machine (fedora 17 + intel 20.2),
the only interpolation modes offered by Xrender are: {nearest ,
bilinear , convolution, fast , good, best}
I always thought best translates into something better than bilinear,
but it seems to be just equal to it.
Is there any way to archive bicubic interpolation or any other
higher-than-bilinear interpolation using xrender?
As Java2D offers bicubic interpolation, it would mean a fallback to
software-rendering every time a program requests high-quality
interpolation.
'Best' might be bicubic. It might be nearest. It might be anything,
it's just whatever the driver thinks will offer the best quality.
Bicubic is not required to be offered, but it may be.
I'm not very familiar with bicubic interpolation, but couldn't it be achieved
using the 'convolution' filter with the adequate kernel? (possibly in several
passes at different scales). AFAIK 'convolution' is always provided and often
accelerated.
Thanks,
- Pierre-Loup
I don't see it in the renderproto, so it's probably not possible
without a spec extension.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/renderproto/tree/render.h
The filters are a list of strings; a protocol extension is not
required for a driver to offer (and a client use) more filters than
the predefined ones.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
