On Mit, 2012-12-05 at 23:14 +0100, Daniel Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > here's a question that I carry around for some time: > > What's the policy on signing something with "Reviewed-by:"? Does it > mean: > a) I've read the patch carefully and don't see any problems. > (i.e. for small and ovious fixes) > and/or > b) I've read the patch carefully and tested it.
Reviewed-by: doesn't imply testing, there's Tested-by: for that. Does this answer your question? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
