> On 2013-02-20 17:28, James Cloos wrote: >> One quick review note: >> >> Per 10646 and unicode, that miniscule sequence should >> be <U+006A U+0301> "j́" and not <U+0237 U+0303> "ȷ́". > > Do you mean (only fix in tyop in quote of my proposal): > > <U+006A U+0301> "j́" and not <U+0237 U+0301> "ȷ́". > > I just noticed that on bitmap fonts such as the command line, one still > sees the dot of the j or a j followed by a filled diamond shape. > >> The i and j are defined to have soft dots; all combining sequence >> starting with either MUST ignore the dot on the base character. >> >> Not all font/rendering engines tuples get this right, but they should, >> and searches et al probably expect j́. > > So indeed there is some work on the rendering part. Attached is a new > patch with you improvement. Does anyone would like to have the reverse > order supported and/or dead keys supported for this? >
Could someone sign off patch 0.2 and add it to the repo? See also http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2013-February/035544.html >> -JimC >> > > Regards, > > Pander > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
