Am 28.05.2013 17:55, schrieb Alan Coopersmith: > On 05/28/13 12:22 AM, walter harms wrote: >> Is the INT_MAX needed here ? running X on 16bit machines seems very odd >> (is that possible ?) > > 16-bits would be SHORT_MAX. INT_MAX is 32-bits on all platforms X > currently > supports. >
This was not my point. 0xffffff is less then INT_MAX. so this condition will apply before INT_MAX any time. re, wh _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
