On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:37:31AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 04:35:51PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > On 06/ 2/13 12:30 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > >XXX: should probably be fixed differently.
> > >---
> > > xrandr.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/xrandr.c b/xrandr.c
> > >index da786cb..0b285a3 100644
> > >--- a/xrandr.c
> > >+++ b/xrandr.c
> > >@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ crtc_set_transform (crtc_t *crtc, transform_t
> > >*transform)
> > > if (major > 1 || (major == 1 && minor >= 3))
> > > XRRSetCrtcTransform (dpy, crtc->crtc.xid,
> > > &transform->transform,
> > >- transform->filter,
> > >+ __UNCONST(transform->filter),
> > > transform->params,
> > > transform->nparams);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, breaks the build since __UNCONST is not defined.
>
> Yeah, needs the bits
> #ifndef __UNCONST
> #define __UNCONST(x) (x)
> #endif
> like the other patch.
Sorry about that. A bit more helpful answer: the __UNCONST(x) that
NetBSD uses is in /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h
#define __UNCONST(a) ((void *)(unsigned long)(const void *)(a))
Do you want a patch for the two __UNCONST uses that has that fallback
define (perhaps __XORG_UNCONST to avoid clashes), or is there a good
common place to put it?
> Better would be if we wouldn't need the unconst cast though :)
That's still true :)
Thomas
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
