James Jones <[email protected]> writes: > I read through this and the extension specification below. The DRI3 > stuff doesn't directly affect our driver at the moment of course, but I > like the direction it's going and the proposed/implied interactions > between DRI3 and Present.
Thanks much for the review. I think the most relevant question for the binary nVidia driver is whether you think you can do something similar in terms of mapping your back buffers into X pixmaps for use by Present. Oh, I'm curious if you think we should be mapping the OML_sync_control UST/MSC/SBC triplet into Sync extension counters. It sure seems like a natural fit to me, and would reduce the size of the Present extension quite a bit. > I read through your futex-based fence sync implementation notes as well. > Seems reasonable to me. I didn't try too hard to poke holes in it > though. I've had a couple of other positive reviews of that code; obviously it's going to take some actual failures before people figure out why it doesn't work right :-) -- [email protected]
pgpR1BXhcGDCS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
