Ah, documentation bug fixes. Awesome! Thanks guys. Yea, I'm not surprised there were some mistakes. That conversion was painful.

Matt


On 06/07/2013 12:31 PM, Jamey Sharp wrote:
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <[email protected]>

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:32:31AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
The XListPixmapFormats arguments was being shown with XImageByteOrder's
name and return types.   Appears to have been a glitch in the nroff ->
docbook conversion.

Reported-by: ZHANG Zhaolong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]>
---
  specs/libX11/CH02.xml |    9 +++------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/specs/libX11/CH02.xml b/specs/libX11/CH02.xml
index 12df68e..5e0e611 100644
--- a/specs/libX11/CH02.xml
+++ b/specs/libX11/CH02.xml
@@ -1511,12 +1511,9 @@ To obtain the pixmap format information for a given 
display, use
  <indexterm 
significance="preferred"><primary>XListPixmapFormats</primary></indexterm>
  <!-- .sM -->
  </para>
-<para>
-ImageByteOrder(<emphasis remap='I'>display</emphasis>)
-</para>
-<funcsynopsis id='XImageByteOrder'>
+<funcsynopsis id='XListPixmapFormats'>
  <funcprototype>
-  <funcdef>int <function>XImageByteOrder</function></funcdef>
+  <funcdef>XPixmapFormatValues 
*<function>XListPixmapFormats</function></funcdef>
    <paramdef>Display<parameter> *display</parameter></paramdef>
    <paramdef>int<parameter> *count_return</parameter></paramdef>
  </funcprototype>
@@ -1577,7 +1574,7 @@ These are often used by toolkits as well as by simple 
applications.
  <para>
  ImageByteOrder(<emphasis remap='I'>display</emphasis>)
  </para>
-<funcsynopsis>
+<funcsynopsis id='XImageByteOrder'>
  <funcprototype>
    <funcdef>int <function>XImageByteOrder</function></funcdef>
    <paramdef>Display<parameter> *display</parameter></paramdef>
--
1.7.9.2

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel


_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to