On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:24:30AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2013-07-16 at 11:56 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > > On 07/13/2013 05:10 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sex, 2013-07-12 at 11:36 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > >> Hi Matt, > > >> > > >> all backports from master, all shipped in Fedora, all making Peter > > >> angry because he had to rebase > > >> them. > > > > > > Hi, > > > with Fedora 19, we have a mass test of 1.14, so some bugs was found we > > > have other 2 patches floating around . > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976995 > > > with patch > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=772539 > > > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66851 > > > with patch > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82364 > > > > > > both seems easy patches , > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have these in a branch I can either pull or cherry-pick? > > Hi, trying to help here , > I follow the bugs of xorg-x11-server on F19 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=xorg-x11-server&list_id=1540048&product=Fedora > > and what is upstream source: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/?h=server-1.14-branch > > I'm following this, since release 3 with VirtualBox fix (upstreamed): > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12681/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-3.fc19
waiting in a pull request, will be upstream soon. > next on release 4, Dave patch (upstreamed) > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12886/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-4.fc19 punted to dave. > and now release 5, other fixes > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12995/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-5.fc19 these will be merged to 1.14 asap > Now it seems that almost all bugs are fixed, but still left this 2 > patches, one in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976995 first half is I think the same as -4 above, punted to dave. Xephyr flag which is 1.15. > reporter says that still need it, easy to see that don't harm , so I > think that Dave could decide and upstream it (or not). Same for other > patch which is in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66851 punting... Cheers, Peter > this patch is more complicated, to me, knowing if it is correct or not, > but seems logic. > > Best regards, > -- > Sérgio M. B. > > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
